The Growth Den
Straight answers · Logan Ice

How to set a MER target from your contribution margin, and hold whoever runs your ads to it

Last updated

Break-even MER is one divided by your contribution margin before marketing. If your margin is 30%, a 3.33x MER means you made nothing. Most "what's a good MER" advice skips that math, which is why brands celebrate numbers that are losing them money. Here is the math, a calculator, and how I use it as the accountability contract for whoever runs your ads.

Start with the only definition that matters

MER, marketing efficiency ratio, is total revenue divided by total marketing spend, across the whole business, for a period. Not one platform. Not one campaign. Everything you made over everything you spent to make it.

I judge marketing on MER and contribution margin because they can't be gamed by attribution settings. Meta's ROAS, Google's ROAS and your attribution tool's blended ROAS are all useful for diagnosing what to change inside a channel, but they overstate, they disagree with each other, and they disagree with Shopify. MER just counts.

The math nobody does

Contribution margin before marketing is what's left of a dollar of revenue after product cost, shipping, payment processing and any other per-order costs, before you spend a cent on marketing. Call it m.

Your break-even MER is 1 divided by m. That's it.

Contribution margin before marketingBreak-even MER
20%5.00x
30%3.33x
40%2.50x
50%2.00x
60%1.67x

So when somebody tells you "a good MER is 3 to 5," the right response is "compared to what margin?" A 3.0 MER at a 25% margin is losing money every single month. A 3.0 MER at a 50% margin is a healthy, growing business. The number means nothing without the margin.

Your break-even MER

Contribution margin here means what's left of a dollar of revenue after product cost, shipping, payment fees and any per-order costs, before you spend anything on marketing.
Break-even MER: 2.86x
At a 35% margin, anything under a 2.86 MER is losing money on every marketing dollar, whatever the ad platform says its ROAS is.

Setting the target, not just the floor

Break-even is the floor. The target sits above it, and how far above depends on what you're trying to do.

If you're trying to grow and you have the cash to do it, a target 20% above break-even is aggressive but sane. If you need marketing to produce profit this year, 40% above break-even is a better place to start. If you have a subscription or a strong repeat rate, you can set a first-order target below break-even and a 90-day cohort target above it, but only if you actually measure the cohorts.

The one thing I'd never do is set the target by looking at last year's MER and adding a bit. That fits the target to the spending instead of the other way around.

Making it the contract with whoever runs your ads

This is the part most brands skip, and it's the reason agencies and in-house buyers so often disagree with the CFO. Everyone is measuring a different thing.

Here's how I set it up on every engagement:

  1. Agree the contribution margin number and write it down. Finance owns it. It gets revisited quarterly.
  2. Derive break-even MER and the target MER from it. Put both on the top of the weekly scorecard.
  3. Whoever runs paid media is judged on blended MER against target, and on contribution dollars, not on their platform's ROAS.
  4. Platform ROAS, CPA, CTR and the rest live on the second tab. They're for diagnosing, not for grading.
  5. When MER drifts below target for two consecutive weeks, spend comes down or creative changes. That's the rule, agreed in advance, so nobody has to fight about it in the moment.

If you hire me for the strategy seat, this is one of the first things I build. If you hire me to run Meta, this is what I ask you to grade me on.

What about incrementality and MMM?

Complex media mix modeling matters at massive scale. For the other 99% of advertisers it's overkill. If you want to know whether a channel is actually incremental, the cheapest honest test is to turn it off in a region or for a period and watch MER. A few brands have done that with Meta lately and the results are always educational. But you don't need a model to start managing to MER this week.

Questions people ask

What is a good MER for an e-commerce brand?

There isn't a universal one. Break-even MER is 1 divided by your contribution margin before marketing, so a 30% margin means 3.33x just to break even, and a 50% margin means 2.0x. A good target is usually 20% to 40% above your break-even.

Should we measure on ROAS or MER?

MER for decisions and platform ROAS for diagnostics. Platform attribution overstates and different platforms disagree with each other; MER is total revenue over total marketing spend and can't be gamed.

Why don't my Meta ads numbers match Shopify?

Attribution windows, view-through conversions, cross-device behavior and modeled conversions. Meta is counting something different from Shopify. That's why I grade on blended MER and contribution margin, not on either report.

How often should we look at MER?

Weekly for management, monthly for decisions about budget, quarterly for revisiting the margin assumption. Single days and single weeks are noisy.

Does MER work for a brand with subscriptions?

Yes, with one adjustment: set a first-order MER floor and a 90-day cohort MER target, and actually track the cohorts. A subscription brand can afford to acquire below break-even on the first order only if the cohort math proves it.

Do we need a media mix model?

Almost certainly not at $5M to $80M. Manage to MER, run simple holdout tests when you want to know if a channel is incremental, and save MMM for when you have the scale and the data team to use it.

Work with Logan

I'm a fractional growth advisor for growth-stage DTC and e-commerce brands. I handle strategy and take execution off your plate, in whatever seat you need, from $7,500 a month.

Let's see if we're a fitSee the seats →

More straight answers